D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s house for clothing that was worn in the crime. What happens outside the house can create an inference that what’s sought is inside. (The good faith exception would also apply.) United States v. Joyner, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136993 (D.D.C. June 19, 2026).

Defendant had no standing or reasonable expectation of privacy in cell phone records of another person. United States v. Tabbs, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137165 (E.D. Pa. June 22, 2026).*

Defendants were suspected of transporting drugs from Los Angeles to Nashville by airplane. When the plane arrived in Nashville, a drug dog alerted on their checked luggage. The bags were sent to the luggage carousel. When they retrieved their bags, the officers stopped them to talk, and they both consented to opening the suitcases. United States v. McCain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136086 (E.D. Mo. May 8, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Airport searches, Consent, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.