D.Ariz.: PC for forfeiture is similar to PC for a warrant

Probable cause for forfeiture is similar to probable cause for a warrant. United States v. Tetherus, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49868 (D. Ariz. Mar. 11, 2026)*:

“The standard of probable cause to support forfeiture is similar to that required to obtain a search warrant.” United States v. Real Property 874 Gartel Drive, Walnut, Cal., 79 F.3d 918, 922 (9th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. One 56-Foot Motor Yacht Named Tahuna, 702 F.2d 1276, 1281 (9th Cir. 1983)). “The government need prove only that it had reasonable grounds to believe that the property was involved in the alleged offenses, ‘supported by less that prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion,’ and that belief may be supported by hearsay evidence.” Id. (quoting Yacht Named Tahuna, 702 F.2d at 1283). A magistrate judge’s “determination of probable cause should be paid great deference by reviewing courts,” and a court must not “invalidate the warrant by interpreting the affidavit in a hypertechnical, rather than a commonsense, manner.” United States v. King, 985 F.3d 702, 707 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 (1983), and United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 109 (1965)).

This entry was posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.