D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

When challenged, the government fails to prove that the area of the stop was “high crime.” There were nine gun seizures in four months in a 500 meter radius. “The Government has established, however, that Abass engaged in unprovoked and almost immediate flight upon noticing police. For the reasons below, this factor partially but not fully supports reasonable suspicion.” It doesn’t here, however. “Although the Government has failed to establish that plus factor here, it points to two other factors that-taken together-narrowly clear the bar,” and that’s that it appeared he was holding a gun against his body while running. United States v. Abass, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221425 (D.D.C. Nov. 10, 2025).

Plaintiff’s civil Franks claim fails. The alleged false statement was neither that nor material.
Ferrara v. Travis Cty. Att’y’s Office, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29567 (5th Cir. Nov. 11, 2025).*

Defendant had an accident in DC. When the police arrived to discuss it, he fled, discarding a gun en route under a car. The record supports that the officer could see an illegal oversized magazine through the window of the car, based on the inference the gun was illegal because it was discarded. Miller v. United States, 2025 D.C. App. LEXIS 367 (Nov. 6, 2025).

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.