W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

Filing a search warrant and application before it is served isn’t a constitutional requirement. [And even if it was, where’s the prejudice?] United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130063 (W.D. Wis. July 8, 2025):

These motions all invoke sovereign citizen type theories and arguments about the use of force during Robinson’s arrest that are identical or materially the same as the arguments the court rejected when it ruled on his motions to dismiss and motion to suppress evidence. See Dkt. 77 (adopting Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 45). The court will deny these motions for the same reasons that it denied Robinson’s previous motions. Robinson’s theory that a search warrant must be filed with the circuit court before it can be lawfully executed is unsupported, and Robinson provides no other explanation for why the search warrant was not lawfully issued. “When evidence is lawfully seized, police misconduct collateral to the seizure does not trigger the application of the exclusionary rule.” United States v. Watson, 558 F.3d 702, 705 (7th Cir. 2009). Neither Robinson’s claims about police misconduct during the execution of the search warrant nor his claims that this court violated his constitutional rights by denying his prior motions are a basis for dismissing the charges against him.

This entry was posted in Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.