MI: Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender on parole not 4A violation

Lifetime electronic monitoring of this sex offender when on parole doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. People v. Van Mai, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 3912 (May 20, 2025).

DUI checkpoint: “The only issue Defendant raises is whether the check point was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment because Sergeant Norris allegedly failed to obtain the requisite approval for establishing it. Because Sergeant Norris complied with the permission policies at issue, Defendant has failed to put forth arguments sufficient to merit a constitutionally mandated reversal.” Columbus Cty. v. Hawkins, 2025 N.C. App. LEXIS 286 (May 21, 2025).*

No record, no appeal: “Here, defendant has failed to present this Court with a record to verify the factual basis of his argument that Detective Callow lied in his search warrant affidavit, gave perjured testimony, or performed an illegal search of defendant’s SIM card.” People v. Bartolomucci, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 3908 (May 20, 2025).*

The CI was brought before the issuing magistrate to attest to the probable cause, which there was for the warrant. People v. Martinez, 2025 NYLJ LEXIS 1663 (Queens Co. May 15, 2025).*

This entry was posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Roadblocks, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.