PA: No REP in data on use of EBT card

Appellant’s argument that the search incident failed because of a lack of an arrest warrant wasn’t presented below so it’s waived. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the data on his EBT card that Wawa wouldn’t turn over to the police. Commonwealth v. Hoyle, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 216 (May 16, 2025).*

“Officer Fuller’s testimony that he paced Upchurch speeding and saw him turning and changing lanes without signaling amply supports the initial stop.” Defendant’s furtive movement which turned out to be hiding a gun magazine was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Upchurch, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93680 (D. Ariz. May 16, 2025).*

Plaintiff sued the local police department, as well as others, for taking possession of his car after an accident. The PD and others moved to dismiss which plaintiff didn’t answer. Dismissed. Page v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92655 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025).*

Plaintiff doesn’t show a material misstatement of fact to support his civil Franks claim. Welsh v. Hester, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 11818 (5th Cir. May 15, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.