CA4: SW affidavit not required to name an offender

A search warrant is about whether evidence would be found in the place to be searched, not whether there’s an offender. United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10138 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2025).

2255 petitioner’s Franks ineffective assistance of counsel claim was speculative and denied. Key v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79312 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 28, 2025).*

Defendant was a guest at a friend’s place, and his car was to be towed from the driveway because it wasn’t properly licensed. The dog sniff while waiting for the tow truck was reasonable, and the area wasn’t curtilage. United States v. Contreras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79325 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2025).*

CSLI obtained in 2013 was with good faith. United States v. Age, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9947 (5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.