OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

Following defendant in an unmarked car was not a seizure. Defendant ultimately voluntarily stopped and talked to the officer. State v. Serini, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 446 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

When defendant was placed in the patrol car, the officer had reasonable suspicion that he was under the influence. Martinez-Orta v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 78 (Mar. 18, 2025).*

The person handing over a bag of ammunition had apparent authority to do so, and the contents of the bag were immediately apparently. United States v. Smith, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6399 (4th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025).*

To the extent the sufficiency of evidence argument could be construed to be a suppression of evidence argument, it was waived by failing to present it below. Henry v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 174 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.