CA3: USMJ does not need to see child porn to issue a SW for it

Government investigators searched for files on defendant’s computer when it was open for P2P sharing, and, finding child pornography, they got a search warrant for his computer. The USMJ did not have to see the alleged child porn to find probable cause. United States v. Beatty, 437 Fed. Appx. 185 (3d Cir. 2011).*

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging his wife’s consent on appeal because she consent without coercion. It was alleged that she was threatened with her kids, but that was not the case. United States v. Henderson, 437 Fed. Appx. 96 (3d Cir. 2011).*

The evidence supported the district court’s conclusion that the defendant consented. “Delaney fails to show that the district court’s credibility finding with regard to the police officers’ testimony that he gave consent was based on ‘“exceedingly improbable testimony”’ and thus clearly erroneous, United States v. Mapp, 476 F.3d 1012, 1017 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. Adamson, 441 F.3d 513, 519 (7th Cir. 2006)).” United States v. Delaney, 397 U.S. App. D.C. 133, 651 F.3d 15 (2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.