OH7: House-sitter had apparent authority to consent to a protective sweep

Defendant got shot in his house and went to the hospital. He called a friend to take care of the house while he was hospitalized. When the friend got there, he saw a bloody sheet in the house, and he called the police to come and look for intruders, knowing that defendant’s assailants had not been apprehended. As a house-sitter, he had apparent authority to consent to that entry for a protective sweep, and bomb-making materials were found. State v. Telshaw, 2011 Ohio 3373, 195 Ohio App. 3d 596, 961 N.E.2d 223 (7th Dist. 2011):

[*20] Using Huntington as a guide in our analysis, it appears that in the instant case, Mr. Utsinger’s function is directly analogous to a house-sitter. As such, he had authority to allow police into Appellant’s house. In the matter before us, Mr. Utsinger had authority over the entire premises and its contents, and was specifically asked to safeguard both. There is no evidence of any limitation on Mr. Utsinger’s authority over the property, and no evidence that Appellant instructed Utsinger not to allow police to help him secure the property if needed. Appellant actually told Utsinger to safeguard the property in the house as well as the house, thus giving him free reign over the entire premises. Furthermore, Utsinger did not ask the police to enter the property to look for evidence that Appellant had committed a crime, but rather, to help Utsinger secure the property as he had been directed. Although Appellant did not specifically give Utsinger instructions to reside in the property, it is clear from the record that Utsinger had plenary control over the property to inspect it, examine it, protect it, secure it, and perform whatever function was necessary to safeguard the premises and its contents. Thus, any reasonable police officer would conclude that Utsinger had at least the authority to ask for police assistance in checking the premises for intruders when he found the front door open and a bloody sheet in the doorway, knowing that a crime recently had been committed on the property and that the perpetrators had not yet been apprehended.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.