E.D.Pa.: Cell phone passcode given by consent, but Cellebrite can open phone anyway

Defendant consented to giving up the passcode to his phone. The court notes in n.2 that Cellebrite can crack the passcodes. United States v. Frey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141180 n.2 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2023).

Defendant was reasonably denied his second amended 2255 over a search issue where he didn’t even show standing underlying the search. Duerson v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 21079 (6th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023).*

There was reasonable suspicion for the CBP stop on a rural road in Vermont near the border where the RCMP warned three people were on foot coming that way and there was no apparent reason for this rented vehicle to be on a dead end local road. United States v. Cruz-Castelazo, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140021 (D.Vt. Aug. 11, 2023).*

“In light of the Government’s representation that it will not introduce in its case-in-chief at trial evidence obtained as a result of the execution of the search warrant for Defendant’s cell phone, Defendant’s motion to suppress such evidence is moot.” United States v. Solomon, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140030 (D.Minn. Aug. 11, 2023).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion defendant was in the truck they stopped. United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 20941 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Immigration checkpoints, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.