CA7: Inevitable impoundment of car mooted claim dog jumped in car

Defendant’s car was inevitably going to be searched after impoundment, so the question of the drug dog jumping into the car doesn’t have to be decided. United States v. Overton, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16158 (7th Cir. June 13, 2022).

Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel on defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that would not succeed. State v. Fenderson, 2022-Ohio-1973, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1866 (6th Dist. June 10, 2022);* McNair v. State, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 263 (June 13, 2022).*

Defendant’s patdown during a traffic stop was based on reasonable suspicion for the officer’s knowledge defendant was known to carry firearms. United States v. Alston, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104712 (W.D.Pa. June 13, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.