MI: Possession of MJ that’s only a civil infraction doesn’t justify search of car under automobile exception

Michigan, by ballot initiative, made possession of a small amount of marijuana a civil infraction. The smell of marijuana here only appeared to be a civil infraction and not a crime, so the automobile exception did not justify the search of defendant’s car for evidence of a crime. People v. Wilkins, 2026 Mich. LEXIS 1461 (July 22, 2026). From the syllabus by the court:

In this case, where the trooper had probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained a small amount of marijuana—i.e., that a civil infraction had occurred, but not that the vehicle contained evidence of a crime—this probable cause was insufficient to support a warrantless search under the automobile exception. That the trooper smelled marijuana was also insufficient, alone or combined with the passenger’s statement indicating that she may have had a small amount of marijuana, to establish probable cause to believe that a criminal amount of marijuana was present in the car.

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.