OH2: Def had no standing to challenge pings of another’s phone

Defendant had no standing to challenge pings of another’s phone. State v. Farra, 2022-Ohio-1421, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1321 (2d Dist. Apr. 29, 2022).

Even a locked safe in a car is subject to the automobile exception. State v. Malone, 2022-Ohio-1409, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1299 (4th Dist. Apr. 21, 2022).

A warrant for state probation’s GPS tracking of a probationer was reasonable. United States v. Goncalves-Mendes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77973 (D.Mass. Apr. 29, 2022).

The stop was extended with reasonable suspicion when he had a 12-year-old runaway in his car. United States v. Brumfield, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77904 (N.D.Okla. Apr. 29, 2022).*

This entry was posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.