S.D.Cal.: 4A violations are for suppression, not dismissal

“Searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment do not require dismissing an indictment; instead, the remedy is suppressing the evidence at trial.” United States v. Ramirez-Aleman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77436 (S.D.Cal. Apr. 26, 2022).

Defendant officers have a complete defense for an arrest on probable cause. Novak v. City of Parma, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 11682 (6th Cir. Apr. 29, 2022).*

Two police officers’ observations of defendant’s car speeding was justification for the stop. United States v. Holley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77900 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2022).*

Defendant doesn’t show that a Franks challenge would change the outcome of the warrant. United States v. Smith, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78170 (D.Md. Apr. 29, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.