DC: Facebook has no right to a SW instead of subpoena for subscriber information on an account

A civil investigative subpoena to Facebook for information about posters of Covid misinformation was not unreasonable. n.3: “Meta suggests that the Fourth Amendment requires the District to obtain a search warrant to get this information. … One sufficient response is that the Fourth Amendment protects only privacy interests that society accepts as objectively reasonable, see United States v. Kyle, 2022 D.C. App. LEXIS 58, at *3-4 (D.C. Feb. 10, 2022), and Facebook users do not have an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in information that they include in public posts about COVID-19 vaccines and their identities.” District of Columbia v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 2022 D.C. Super. LEXIS 2 (Mar. 9, 2022).

Child pornography traced to an IP address is probable cause for computers there. People v. Socciarelli, 2022 NY Slip Op 01630, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1647 (4th Dept. Mar. 11, 2022).*

After a search warrant for records, the plaintiff sued for return of property and lost. Then it filed this action for a declaratory judgment that what it was doing wasn’t illegal. That’s essentially seeking a declaratory judgment barring prosecution. Denied. Hawk Innovative Tech, LLC v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46224 (N.D.Ga. Jan. 25, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Social media warrants. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.