OR: Knock-and-talk led to multiple requests for consent everywhere the officer asked to look, and it was all valid

An officer came to defendant’s house on a knock-and-talk to ask about a stolen computer. “Defendant said that he had only two computers, one in the living room and one in his bedroom. After defendant showed the deputies a desktop computer in the living room, Yazzolino asked to see the computer in the bedroom. Defendant consented but asked whether they had a ‘good reason’ for talking to him. Yazzolino replied, ‘I wouldn’t be there if I didn’t.’” Defendant succeeded in being asked for consent serially about various things in his house and consented to all of it. Officers found guns, and he admitted that he was a felon in possession. He contended that he was coerced but he agreed that the officer used “nice words.” He was found to have voluntarily consented, over and over again. State v. Zamora, 237 Ore. App. 514, 240 P.3d 91 (2010).*

When the officer first asked for consent to search defendant’s car, it was denied and he did not have probable cause. Then, defendant’s girlfriend admitted there was marijuana in the car, and that gave probable cause to search it and it was still mobile. State v. Kurokawa-Lasciak, 237 Ore. App. 492, 239 P.3d 1046 (2010).*

Defendant’s travel plans here were indicative of reasonable suspicion on the totality of circumstances [and, it is barely suspicious]. United States v. Berg, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106730 (E.D. Mich. October 6, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.