MT: Furtive movements led to a probation search of car

The record showed that defendant’s furtive movements in the car were reasonable suspicion and the defendant was on probation, so the officer was able to conduct a probation search on that reasonable suspicion. State v. Charlie, 2010 MT 195, 357 Mont. 355, 239 P.3d 934 (2010).*

The defendant was stopped because “he had committed a plethora of traffic violations, which included his operation of the vehicle without insurance.” His furtive movements in the car made the officer direct him out of the car, and she asked him for consent to search his person, which he voluntarily gave. Meth was found. Delijevic v. State, 323 S.W.3d 606 (Tex. App. – Amarillo September 7, 2010).*

Defendant did not dispute the government’s factual assertions in its response to his motion so a hearing is denied. Otherwise, defendant lacked standing, and the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applied. United States v. Barragan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93530 (W.D. Pa. April 23, 2010), adopted 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93533 (W.D. Pa. August 10, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.