CA6: Frisk for eating out of a dumpster was unreasonable

Plaintiff’s frisk for eating out of a dumpster was unreasonable. He wasn’t committing any crime. Jones v. City of ElyriaJones v. City of ElyriaJones v. City of Elyria, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1609 (6th Cir. Jan. 17, 2020).*

There was no Fourth Amendment violation where defendant refused to identify himself during a public intox stop, and he was thus arrested under Utah law. Handcuffing him behind his back wasn’t unreasonable. Donahue v. Wihongi, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1600 (10th Cir. Jan. 17, 2020).*

Defendant’s post-conviction claim is based in part on the alleged issue that defendant counsel didn’t tell him there was a search warrant for his car. There was, and it was in the discovery that was shared with defendant. State v. Miles, 2020 Del. Super. LEXIS 30 (Jan. 15, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.