W.D.Wis.: SI may precede actual arrest

Search incident may precede actual arrest if there is probable cause. [The case law has supported this for at least 40 years.] United States v. McCauley, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17162 (W.D. Wis. February 2, 2010).

CI’s controlled buy was probable cause for search warrant. State v. Dee, 34 So. 3d 892 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2010).*

Defendant was not being pursued when he ran and tossed a gun. The officer walked into an area where defendant was, and apparently was not even focused on defendant when he took off and dropped the gun. State v. Loeb, 34 So. 3d 917 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2010).*

While this was a really close case, the court finds reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop and eventual patdown. Commonwealth v. Cabrera, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 341, 921 N.E.2d 1026 (2010).*

Defendant’s window tint stop led to finding an arrest warrant on him and that led to a valid search. People v. Carter, 182 Cal. App. 4th 522, 105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805 (2d Dist. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.