CA4: Odor of marijuana from a car PC to search

Odor of marijuana was enough probable cause for a search during an otherwise valid traffic stop. United States v. Lesane, 361 Fed. Appx. 537 (4th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

For inevitable discovery to apply in the Second Circuit, there must be a “high level of confidence” that the search warrant would have issued. United States v. Cabassa, 62 F.3d 470 (2d Cir. 1995). United States v. Wilke, 689 F. Supp. 2d 455 (W.D. N.Y. 2010).*

Defendant’s consent during a traffic stop was shown by the government to be free and voluntary. The consent was rather easily achieved, shortly into the stop, and defendant did not have a right to be informed of his right to refuse. United States v. Cousin, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3688 (E.D. Tenn. January 19, 2010).*

First entry into house was by consent, and that produced a small bag of marijuana. That observation validly made it into the search warrant request which authorized a greater search. United States v. McNeil, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3747 (M.D. Pa. January 19, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.