MD: Dog alert on car gave RS to frisk all occupants

Officer was justified in frisking defendant for weapons after the car he was in was stopped and a drug dog gave a positive alert. Stokeling v. State, 189 Md. App. 653, 985 A.2d 175 (2009).

In response to defendant’s claim that his search incident was invalid under Gant, the government instead relies on reasonable suspicion for the stop, which was found, and probable cause for a search based on the smell of marijuana, which was found. United States v. Awolowo, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121798 (E.D. Tenn. December 14, 2009).*

Defendant was speeding. “The fact that the officers were looking for Jesus Huerta to arrest him on an outstanding federal warrant is quite beside the point; so-called pretextual traffic stops are permissible so long as the officer has probable cause to believe that a traffic violation had occurred.” United States v. Huerta, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121778 (E.D. Tenn. December 9, 2009)* (And, if they had PC to believe that Huerta was in the vehicle, that would support the stop, too.)

A person not legitimately on the premises at the time of an alleged illegal search has no “standing” to sue either. McPheters v. City of Boise, 361 Fed. Appx. 754 (9th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Officers were assured that defendant was in the place where the officers went with an arrest warrant, so the entry was with knowledge he would be found there. United States v. Collins, 359 Fed. Appx. 639, 2010 FED App. 0001N (6th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.