AR: Cell phone search suppressed and state gets do over with independent source doctrine

Probable cause was shown for a search warrant for a cell phone for taking video of defendant’s daughters changing clothes under a door. The independent source doctrine permitted police to get a second search warrant for the phone after the first was suppressed for failing to accurately describe how the police came into possession of the phone. The contents of the prior search didn’t make it into the affidavit. Johnson v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 429, 2018 Ark. App. LEXIS 524 (Sep. 19, 2018).

Police were called about a trespasser at 2:45 am and defendant was stopped after officers saw him driving erratically and on the wrong side of the road. Defendant’s fast speech and explanation that he was on the other person’s property looking for a vehicle title at 2:45 am and his driving on the wrong side of the road supported reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence of drugs. The stop was reasonable in length. Defendant wasn’t handcuffed when the officer was talking to him, and that here means he was not in custody. The government concedes that some of the evidence can be suppressed, so that’s as far as it’s granted. United States v. Marin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159967 (N.D. Iowa Sep. 19, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.