D.S.D.: General description of a handyman’s tools as “miscellaneous tools” did not make the inventory “defective”

General description of a handyman’s tools as “miscellaneous tools” did not make the inventory “defective.” United States v. Bruce, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7387 (D.S.D. Jan 17, 2018).

“Although the affidavit in the instant case could have provided more information regarding details of the controlled buy, the affidavit did not contain ‘wholly conclusory statements’ that were ‘so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in [their] existence entirely unreasonable.’” United States v. Lindsay, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 1168 (5th Cir. Jan. 18, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.