Peeing in a parking lot is reasonable suspicion of “public nudity” justifying a stop. State v. Harris, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 18994 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 15, 2017).
Defendant’s rental company maintenance man was acting as a private citizen when he entered to repair the oven and saw defendant’s silencer. United States v. Coffell, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25221 (11th Cir. Dec. 14, 2017).*
“A motion to suppress is the proper procedural device to challenge the state’s substantial compliance with regulations governing the collection and handling of urine samples, but not to challenge admissibility based on evidentiary grounds such as authentication and chain of custody under Evid.R. 901.” State v. Woltz, 2017-Ohio-9042, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5478 (4th Dist. Nov. 28, 2017).*