Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his car under the state constitution from a surreptitious silent video recording of a drug transaction. The trial court erred in granting it. Indeed, the filing of the motion to suppress on the eve of trial was too late. The defense filed numerous pretrial motions, but not this one, and it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to consider it so late. Commonwealth v. Enos, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1002 (Dec. 8, 2017) (memorandum).
There was reasonable suspicion to extend defendant’s stop because the paperwork on the car didn’t match his story and then the way he answered questions. [This is really thin.] State v. $127,930 United States Currency, 2017 ND 282, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 293 (Dec. 7, 2017).*