Nine days of pole camera surveillance did not violate the Fourth Amendment. State v. Duvernay, 2017-Ohio-4219, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2279 (3d Dist. June 12, 2017).
The officer’s briefly talking to the defendant driver and his passenger did not unlawfully extend the stop. When the stop was over, defendant consented to further discussions. United States v. Torres, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88662 (D. N.M. June 9, 2017).*