TN: While tip was anonymous, def’s apparent impaired driving was RS

Officers received a 911 anonymous tip about a suspected impaired driver. Observing the driving gave reasonable suspicion for the stop, and whether Navarette is implicated doesn’t need to be decided and is outside question certified for review. State v. Headla, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1061 (Dec. 30, 2015).*

Defendant was walking in a high crime area in the street and moved to the sidewalk when he saw the officer. His pace picked up, and the placement of his hands suggested that he was armed. On the totality of circumstances, a frisk for a weapon was justified. United States v. McGautha, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173210 (W.D.Mo. Nov. 5, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172709 (W.D.Mo. Dec. 29, 2015).*

The defendant got the benefit of the credibility determination on the voluntariness of consent apparently because the body cam microphone wasn’t working, and the evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion. State v. Tirado, 2015-Ohio-5512, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 5322 (5th Dist. Dec. 30, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Body cameras, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.