IN: Concerned citizen report of man likely with gun was sufficient for encounter

Identified citizen informant’s 911 call that a man in the neighborhood appeared to be armed was reason for a police encounter with the defendant who became more skittish as they talked. Concerned citizen tips are important and should be acted on when appropriate. Polson v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 784 (Dec. 31, 2015):

P17 Courts across the country have recognized the importance of concerned citizen tips to law enforcement officers, and some jurisdictions have even found this information more reliable than that of a professional informant or anonymous tipster. See Pawloski v. State, 269 Ind. 350, 380 N.E.2d 1230, 1232 (1978). These individuals generally come forward with information out of the spirit of good citizenship and a desire to help law enforcement. Id. Prompt law enforcement response to this type of information is part and parcel of the community policing effort that is an essential function of law enforcement.

P18 Our supreme court has determined that a tip provided by a concerned citizen was sufficient to create reasonable suspicion where the caller provided additional information to police which the police [then] corroborated. Kellems v. State, 842 N.E.2d 352, 353 (Ind. 2006). Terry stops have a limited scope and purpose, “not to discover evidence of a crime, but to allow the officer to pursue his investigation without fear of violence …” Id. at 355. “[S]ince reasonable suspicion is all that is necessary to support a Terry stop and it is a less demanding standard than probable cause … [t]he Fourth Amendment requires [only] some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.” Id (internal citations omitted).

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.