E.D.Mich.: Reasonable to infer that robbers usually keep weapons and proceeds at home

It was a reasonable inference that a suspected robber would keep the weapons used and the proceeds of the robbery in his house. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Morgan, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48758 (E.D. Mich. March 4, 2015).

Defendant’s stop for a “marked lane violation” was supported by the officer’s testimony and the video of defendant’s driving. State v. Harrison, 2015-Ohio-1419, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 1368 (3d Dist. April 13, 2015).*

Defendant was stopped for no headlights at night. There were lights, but not headlights, and that’s what the statute requires. City of Ontario v. Wright, 2015-Ohio-1426, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 1382 (5th Dist. April 13, 2015).*

Defendant didn’t file a motion to suppress the wiretap evidence after receiving the sealing orders well after trial and a week before sentencing. The court refuses to suppress on this basis alone on appeal since what little discussion there was in the district court was that it was speculative any motion to suppress would have been granted. United States v. Scott, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025 (3d Cir. April 14, 2015).*