IL: 5-7 minute delay before dog sniff wasn’t unreasonable

The court of appeals thinks that the officer having the driver close the windows and turn on the heater for a dog sniff is a search, but the state supreme court disagrees, and the court is bound by it. Also, the wait for the sniff was only 5-7 minutes and that didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop. People v. Thomas, 2014 IL App (3d) 120676, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 750 (October 27, 2014),* modified on denial of rehearing 2015 IL App (3d) 120676, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 958 (January 8, 2015).*

Defendant was stopped for jaywalking. Because he was in a high crime area with a recent shooting, defendant was asked about whether he was armed and he admitted it. A frisk was thus reasonable. State v. Moorer, 2014-Ohio-4776, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4641 (10th Dist. October 28, 2014).*

Police received information of a drug deal going down on a McDonald’s parking lot between two identified cars. The officer was able to walk right up to them and observe defendant doing heroin. The order to put his hands on the dashboard was a stop, but it was all with reasonable suspicion. State v. Rudnitskyy, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1490 (October 29, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.