W.D.Tex.: Meth torch on front seat added to RS to prolong stop

A torch commonly used by methamphetamine users on the front seat next to the defendant and other things developed during questioning justified prolonging the stop. Also, defendant had a Canadian DL and it couldn’t be accessed through NCIC, and a call to EPIC took a while and that showed defendant was involved in a money laundering case. United States v. Schmidt, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133988 (W.D. Tex. September 24, 2014).*

Appellate court can’t second guess district court’s finding officer was credible when he said the stop was for apparently window tint violation (it turned out to be legal) and then smelling marijuana in the car. United States v. Mitchell, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18307 (4th Cir. September 24, 2014).*

Through questioning, CBP officers developed probable cause to believe defendant was smuggling a large amount of cash outside the country without having filed a CMIR form. The question of whether a stop on the jetway at the airport was even the functional equivalent of the border need not be reached. [Likely not since the flight was from BWI to ATL to Jamaica.] United States v. Taylor, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18312 (4th Cir. September 24, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.