D.Md.: GPS order could include rental cars for up to 60 days

A GPS warrant could issue for future rental vehicles for a fixed time frame. Defendant used weekly rented rental vehicles to transport drugs and there was no way of predicting what his next vehicle would be. United States v. Miller, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134481 (D. Md. September 24, 2014):

I shall assume, arguendo, that Miller has standing to challenge the use of the GPS devices on vehicles that were not registered to him or owned by him. Of import here, the government notes that at trial it only intends to introduce evidence recovered from the 2004 Ford van registered to Ms. Coldiron. It also represents that the evidence was obtained pursuant to a search warrant predicated on independent probable cause. See ECF 78 at 23; Warrant, ECF 78-8. On this basis, defendant’s GPS claims appear moot.

Alternatively, as to the Order of April 30, 2013, I am satisfied that the State judge had probable cause to believe that Miller was using rental vehicles for his drug distribution, and that he frequently, if not weekly, changed rental vehicles. Moreover, law enforcement could not know in advance the particulars of the vehicles to be rented in the future by Miller. The reference in the application to the vehicles from Dollar/Thrift and Avis in April 2013 served to illustrate to the State court the frequency with which Miller rented (and changed) vehicles. The only sensible interpretation of the order’s reference to “the aforementioned vehicles” was that it authorized, for 60 days, the use of a GPS device on any vehicles that Miller would rent in that limited time frame. Law enforcement could not know in advance the particulars of those vehicles. In any event, Detective Penman acted in good faith in relying on the court order authorizing the use of the GPS devices on unknown vehicles to be rented by Miller in the ensuing 60 days.

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.