CA11: Stop of wrong car on a BOLO was still with RS, and the search was valid because only stop was argued

Officers received a robbery report at 12:30 am that multiple men in a 2011 white Charger had robbed a man at outside an apartment building. Within minutes and four miles away, they pulled in behind a white Charger which is easy to find because of its distinct taillights. After a traffic offense, it was pulled over, and the officers drew down on them. Everybody inside was cooperative, and warrants came back on the driver. He was arrested and the car searched, and a gun was found which the driver claimed, and he was a felon. It turned out that this was not the car involved in the robbery, because it was found closer to the scene of the robbery by other officers. The stop was reasonable because of the same description, number of occupants, and proximity to the robbery. The search of the car was still reasonable because the driver was being arrested, and that issue wasn’t raised on appeal; only the legality of the stop was. United States v. McCall, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7286 (11th Cir. April 18, 2014).*

Defendant was arrested on two arrest warrants, and he yelled to his mother to keep the police out of the house. He was driven off to jail, and the officers talked to his mother and concluded that she had either actual authority or apparent authority to consent to a search of his room, which was all supported by the evidence. Their reliance on her consent was valid under Fernandez. State v. Tena, 2014 Ida. App. LEXIS 35 (April 17, 2014).

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.