Category Archives: Apparent authority

S.D.N.Y.: A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent

A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent. United States v. Turner, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75088 (S.D. N.Y. June 2, 2014): This … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent

IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

Two police officers came to defendant’s home to arrest her for DUI, and her husband arguably consented to an entry to arrest her. Her locking herself in the bathroom, however, was a rejection of consent and binding. The officer’s threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

Officers came to plaintiff’s house with his former girlfriend who they contend consented to the entry. She, however, had no key to the house and they broke in through a window. Plaintiff stated a § 1983 claim because it wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

CA11: Stop of wrong car on a BOLO was still with RS, and the search was valid because only stop was argued

Officers received a robbery report at 12:30 am that multiple men in a 2011 white Charger had robbed a man at outside an apartment building. Within minutes and four miles away, they pulled in behind a white Charger which is … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Stop of wrong car on a BOLO was still with RS, and the search was valid because only stop was argued