CA8: Arrest for possession of a weapon in the face of a complete “journey” defense was w/o PC, so no QI

Officer who arrested 1983 plaintiff for possession of a semi-automatic weapon who was clearly on a “journey,” a complete defense at the time [since strengthened by new state law], had no qualified immunity. Because of the complete defense, there was no probable cause for the arrest. Stoner v. Watlingten, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22586 (8th Cir. November 7, 2013).

The product of wiretaps was attested to by four officers on the search warrant affidavit. Defendant was talking about packaging and distributing drugs. That was probable cause. United States v. Dowdell, 546 Fed. Appx. 128 (4th Cir. 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.