D.Utah: Traffic stop on curtilage is still valid

A traffic stop on the curtilage affords police the ability to stop and inquire under Collins v. Virginia. “Curtilage is a concept that safeguards a person’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, but it is not a protective force field that shields a person from the consequences of committing a traffic infraction in front of a police officer simply because the driver then reaches the safety of home.” Hardy v. McGaha, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52525 (D. Utah Mar. 12, 2026).

Defendant contends that the officer was “deceitful” because he said he had reasonable suspicion and could apply for a warrant (which requires probable cause). However, defendant had no DL, so the vehicle could be towed anyway. Ultimately it was by consent. United States v. Gonzalez-Nieves, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52542 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2026).*

Defendant doesn’t tell the court how the Fourth Amendment was violated. People v. Clase, 2026 NY Slip Op 50297(U) (N.Y. Co. Mar. 10, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Curtilage, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.