E.D.Mo.: Neither RS nor PC required for electronics search at border

Neither reasonable suspicion or probable cause is required for a border search of electronic equipment. Here, it was at Newark airport. United States v. Bill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234680 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 2, 2025).

Defendant who had 19 prior exposures to the criminal justice system consented. United States v. Woods, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234673 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 2, 2025).

A student disciplinary proceeding was not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Mozdziak v. Romeo, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 250851 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2025).*

Petitioner had his opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost, and that’s binding on habeas. Morrill v. Dixon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234710 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 30, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Voluntariness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.