MD: Blading to hide a heavy pocket apparently with a gun in high crime area contributed to RS

Attempting to conceal an apparent gun in a high crime area contributed to reasonable suspicion. “The State argues that the court did not err. According to the State, the detective testified about his specific observations that gave rise to a reasonable suspicion and a justification for a Terry stop. These factors included the detective’s observations of Appellant blading his body to conceal a firearm, the visible bulge in his pocket, the apparent weight of the object as it moved, and the fact that the tactical team was operating in a known high-crime area.” Booker v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 735 (Aug. 28, 2025).*

The trial court’s determination that it did not believe the officers that an incoming text message stayed illuminated on defendant’s cell phone so it could be photographed was binding. The suppression of the cell phone search is thus affirmed. Commonwealth v. Carter, 2025 PA Super 190 (Aug. 29, 2025).*

FBI SWAT team’s knock-and-talk to arrest an MS-13 member for a kidnapping and murder was reasonable. United States v. Contreras, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 22277 (4th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.