S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

The government says it doesn’t intend to use challenged evidence, so the motion to suppress is moot. If the government changes its mind, defendant can reassert it. United States v. Combs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25641 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025).*

Defendants pled in state court, and those cases became part of a larger RICO case in federal court. Their guilty pleas were waivers in state court but did not have preclusive effect on raising a Fourth Amendment claim in the RICO case. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25915 (E.D. La. Feb. 13, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mootness, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.