IL: Flight in a high crime area on seeing police is not reasonable suspicion

Presence in a high crime area is not itself reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s flight on seeing officers was not reasonable suspicion in itself, and defendant’s stop was properly suppressed. People v. Harris, 2011 IL App (1st) 103382, 354 Ill. Dec. 336, 957 N.E.2d 930 (2011).*

Defendant’s wife was on probation, and he left a safe open and unlocked in their bedroom. The probation officer came for a probation search, and the search of the safe was valid because it was unlocked, meaning that his wife would have had access to it if she were home. State v. Finley, 2011 MT 218, 362 Mont. 35, 260 P.3d 175 (2011).*

A person at a rapid transit station told police her phone was stolen, and she identified three men as possibly being the one. The officer approached defendant to ask him, and he was agitated, but emptying his pockets. In the process, his shirt came up and the officer could see a gun which he had to struggle with the defendant to remove. The encounter with the defendant was consensual up to that point when reasonable suspicion developed upon seeing the gun. United States v. Ali, 437 Fed. Appx. 439 (6th Cir. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.