OH: Negligent disposal of def’s car in impound while he was in jail wasn’t done in bad faith

Police searched defendant’s car at the impound lot, and he was sent certified mail to tell him to pick it up or it would be disposed of. They mailed it to his house while he was in jail so he never knew about it. He moved to suppress everything about the vehicle for the police having disposed of it. The court, however, found this all a result of negligence, not bad faith, and refused to suppress. “This court does not condone the State’s destruction of potentially useful evidence in this case. But after a careful review, we conclude that the destruction was the result of negligence, not bad faith. In simple terms, it seems that the left hand just did not know what the right hand was doing.” State v. Griffin, 2024-Ohio-4894, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3655 (8th Dist. Oct. 8, 2024).

Defendant’s late 2255 based on police misconduct involves an appellate waiver. Moreover, it doesn’t satisfy the actual innocence requirements. United States v. Baker, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185403 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2024).*

A tattoo search in prison to identify gang members was reasonable and here lasted 30 seconds. Golden v. Ohio Dep’t of Rehab., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185400 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory, Prison and jail searches, Strip search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.