OH1: “Suspicious vehicle” report didn’t justify stop when it drove off as officers were looking at it

Officers had a report of a suspicious vehicle on an apartment complex parking lot. They stopped and shined lights on it and looked. After about a minute, the vehicle drove off. The stop was without reasonable suspicion and was a felony level stop without justification. The trial court suppressed, and it’s affirmed. State v. Jackson, 2024-Ohio-4770, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3539 (1st Dist. Oct. 1, 2024).

Defense counsel’s advice to not pursue an “uncertain” motion to suppress in exchange for the government dropping a five year consecutive count for a plea was not unreasonable strategic advice. United States v. Dumay, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180184 (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2024).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest by the time his car was towed. The subjective intent of the officers alleged to be a bogus inventory is unavailing here. Then they got a search warrant. State v. Walls, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 711 (Oct. 1, 2024).*

There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant so defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Reber, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 756 (Oct. 1, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.