D.Mont.: Asking about drugs made this stop intimidating and governed by Rodrieguez

During this stop, the officer finally asked about drugs in the car. “At this moment, the encounter became intimidating, and a reasonable person in Tripp’s situation would not feel free to leave. The encounter thus ripened into a Terry, or investigative, stop, which required reasonable suspicion that Tripp was engaged in criminal activity.” The officer thought a straw was drug paraphernalia, but it was a clean drinking straw, and any reasonable suspicion evaporated. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Tripp, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139539 (D. Mont. Aug. 6, 2024).

There was probable cause for the warrant on the totality of the affidavit. A typo didn’t create a Franks issue. “Despite the ‘West v. East’ error on the face of the search warrant, Leon is applicable because defendant Jordan has not established that a Franks violation occurred.” United States v. Jordan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139481 (E.D. Mo. June 18, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138249 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 5, 2024).*

Probable cause developed during the traffic stop. United States v. Sena, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139672 (D.N.M. Aug. 6, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.