VA: Open container violation here justified full search of car

Here, an open container with the smell of alcohol justified a full vehicle search under the automobile exception. “Applying this totality of the circumstances analysis, we hold that the circuit court did not err in finding that probable cause justified the search of Durham’s car. Officer Labat’s testimony reveals that, leading up to the search, he made three key observations: (1) the odor of alcohol coming from inside Durham’s vehicle; (2) an open cup of amber, alcohol-smelling liquid in a front seat cupholder (albeit in the one a little further from the driver); (3) and an open bottle of liquor in the left rear footwell.” Durham v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. LEXIS 48 (Aug. 1, 2024).

“It is ‘plausible in light of the record as a whole’ that Palmer’s front windshield was illegally tinted. … Accordingly, the district court did not err when it concluded that officers had reasonable suspicion to stop Palmer. Because this basis alone supports reasonable suspicion, we need not decide whether officers had reasonable suspicion to believe Palmer committed additional traffic violations for the length of his rims.” United States v. Palmer, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19200 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024).*

The insufficiency of evidence to sustain a conviction moots the search issue on appeal. State v. Isaac, 2024 Minn. LEXIS 408 (July 31, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.