CA2: Family court order for CPS to enter home governed by Fourth Amendment

In a case under submission 26 months, the Second Circuit concludes that a child protective services who obtained a family court order for entry into a house was governed by the Fourth Amendment. The application for the warrant was based on erroneous information that a jury could conclude was knowingly made, thereby denying the state official qualified immunity. Southerland v. City of New York, 652 F.3d 209 (2d Cir. 2011), as Amended 681 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2012).

Defense counsel’s belief that a motion to suppress was futile on the merits but only potentially useful for cross-examination if the case went to trial did not make defense counsel ineffective when defendant pled without the motion having been filed. Luke v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62192 (E.D. Mo. June 10, 2011).*

Defendant’s flight from vehicle on a public road leaving the door open was an abandonment. United States v. Young, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62259 (D. Minn. May 23, 2011).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.