CA6: Search of building next door to def’s building wasn’t reason to suppress def’s search

Officers with a search warrant for 8537 Old Rutledge Pike, Knox County, Tennessee also searched what they believed was an outbuilding at 8533 with a power cord running between them with no indication it was different property. At worst, this was negligence, if that. The remedy would be suppression of the search at 8533 and not 8537 too. United States v. Torres, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29608 (6th Cir. Oct. 24, 2022).

Campus police had probable cause for their arrest of plaintiff for sexual assault. After acquired exculpatory evidence did not undermine it. Collick v. William Paterson Univ., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29503 (3d Cir. Oct. 24, 2022).*

A criminal defendant can’t sue his lawyer under § 1983 for not opposing taking a buccal swab for DNA. Braithwaite v. Gaitman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193506 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2022).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search warrant for defendant’s phone records because there was probable cause for the warrant independent of the specific challenge he makes. Willis v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 280 (Oct. 25, 2022).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Overseizure, Probable cause, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.