The exclusionary rule does not apply in child dependency litigation. In re Christopher L., 2022 Cal. LEXIS 2313 (Apr. 25, 2022) (recognizing rule).
“Hecke is correct that Detective Compton did not provide details of BSC’s criminal history or a description of the new charges he faced in the affidavit. Hecke contends that had the magistrate known this information, it could have affected the magistrate’s assessment of BSC’s credibility and, in turn, the probable cause determination. Yet the mere fact that the affidavit omitted information about the informant’s criminal background or a motive to provide information against the defendant will not destroy the probable cause determination where the rest of the affidavit establishes reliability.” Not a Franks violation. United States v. Hecke, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74641 (N.D.Ind. Apr. 25, 2022).*
Information from a CI was the reasonable suspicion for extending this traffic stop. United States v. Burnette, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74810 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2022).*
SWAT team entry with long guns aimed was temporary and not custody when defendant talked. United States v. Clark, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74815 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 25, 2022).*