W.D.Pa.: Warrantless production of state ALPR data to FBI not governed by Carpenter

The FBI requested the state search its Automated License Plate Reader database for defendant’s LPN to trace the movement of his car. Carpenter simply cannot be made to apply to ALPR data. 106 records were found. United States v. Bowers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196899 (W.D.Pa. Oct. 13, 2021).

A one month delay between information obtained from a wiretap and a search warrant for defendant’s house was not stale because the drug operation there was ongoing. United States v. Jean, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196983 (D.Mass. Oct. 13, 2021).*

The officer’s request for consent to search defendant’s car on the highway came while the officer had thus unreasonably extended the stop. No person would feel they could just get in the car and leave and end the encounter. United States v. Meadows, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197162 (E.D.Ky. Oct. 13, 2021).

This entry was posted in Consent, Informational privacy, Staleness, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.