Genetic testing of newborns in Nebraska not a violation of Fourth Amendment because parents can object before testing

Nebraska law requiring genetic screening of newborns did not violate Fourth Amendment because parents were given notice and an opportunity to object. They also objected on religious grounds (a claim they also lost). Spiering v. Heineman, 448 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (D. Neb. September 12, 2006).

Warrantless entry of home by officer who was fake delivery man was unlawful, and district court’s finding to the contrary was clearly erroneous. Defendant did nothing that implied consent to officer to enter. United States v. Lakoskey, 462 F.3d 965 (8th Cir. September 14, 2006) (Also, driveway not part of protected curtilage.).

Guam customs officers have the authority to detain on entry to Guam even on a flight direct from Hawaii. United States v. Rowland, 464 F.3d 899 (9th Cir. September 13, 2006).

Defendant who pled to misdemeanor charge in state court and who was not indicted by the state for being a felon in possession of a firearm did not waive his Fourth Amendment claim when he was later indicted in federal court for being a felon in possession of a firearm. United States v. Gregg, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23331 (2d Cir. September 12, 2006).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.